The landscape of environmental responsibility is navigating a delicate balance between genuine sustainability and the rising tide of greenwashing manipulation. As consumers, stakeholders, and advocates for a healthier planet, it is imperative that we approach purported eco-friendly initiatives with a discerning eye. While businesses may employ eco-friendly rhetoric to bolster their image, true commitment to sustainability is evidenced through transparent practices, verifiable certifications, and a tangible reduction in environmental impact.

Composting humans, or human composting, refers to the practice of turning human remains into nutrient-rich compost. It has many trade names, including Terramation and Recomposition. There are currently 5 providers in the US. In order of licensing, the first in the US was Herland Forest in Klickitat County, followed closely by Recompose.  They influenced Return Home, then Earth Funeral silently joined the scene, all of Washington state. The final being The Natural Funeral in Colorado. In the United States, human composting is legal in Washington, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, California, New York, and Nevada.

While the idea may seem environmentally friendly at first glance, there are ethical and practical considerations that raise concerns about greenwashing in the human composting arena.

Greenwashing potential: Greenwashing occurs when an organization or practice is presented as environmentally friendly when it may not be as eco-friendly as claimed. Composting humans could be perceived as greenwashing if the environmental benefits are overstated, and the practice is used more as a marketing strategy than a genuine commitment to sustainability.  Katey Houston, Micah Truman, Return Home Funeral

Energy and resource use: The process of composting human remains may involve energy-intensive procedures and the use of resources such as electricity , fuel for transport, and water. If the overall environmental impact of the composting process and transportation process is not carefully considered and minimized, it could lead to unintended negative consequences.

Emissions and transportation: If the composting facility is located far from where the deceased lived (which is the norm), transportation of the remains to the facility will contribute to carbon emissions. The environmental impact of transportation and associated emissions should be factored into the overall sustainability of human composting practices- from the medium to the end product placement.

Chew on this- The resource requirements for growing a crop of alfalfa can vary based on several factors such as climate, soil conditions, agricultural practices, and management techniques. Here are some key resources and factors to consider using this medium base as an example:

Water: Alfalfa is known to have relatively high water requirements compared to some other crops. The amount of water needed depends on factors like local climate, precipitation, and irrigation practices. Water use efficiency measures, such as drip irrigation, can help optimize water usage.

Land: Alfalfa requires arable land for cultivation. The amount of land needed will depend on factors such as yield expectations, planting density, and agricultural practices. Sustainable land management practices can help minimize the environmental impact.

Fertilizers: Alfalfa for example, requires fertilizers to support its growth. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium are among the essential nutrients that may be supplemented based on soil nutrient levels and crop needs. Organic farming practices and precision agriculture can be employed to minimize the use of synthetic fertilizers.

Pesticides and herbicides: Depending on local conditions and pest pressures, alfalfa cultivation may involve the use of pesticides and herbicides. Integrated pest management (IPM) strategies can be employed to minimize the environmental impact of these inputs.

Energy: Energy is required for various stages of alfalfa production, including planting, irrigation, harvesting, and transportation. The type of machinery used, as well as the energy sources for irrigation and other operations, can influence the overall energy footprint. What about the time you transform the decedent? Electricity from lights to music, and daily operations should also be heavily considered.

Transportation: The distance between the alfalfa field and its destination, such as processing facilities or markets, affects the environmental impact associated with transportation. Shorter transportation distances generally result in lower energy consumption and emissions.

Processing and storage: If alfalfa is processed or stored before use, additional resources may be required for these activities. Proper storage practices can help minimize losses and resource use.

Waste and byproducts: Understanding how waste and byproducts from alfalfa cultivation are managed is also important. Efficient use or proper disposal of residues can contribute to sustainability. Oftentimes, we see providers placing non biodegradeable keepsake material in the composting vessels. What happens to this trash?

It's important to note that true sustainability in agriculture involves a holistic approach, considering environmental, social, and economic aspects. Sustainable farming practices, precision agriculture, and technologies that optimize resource use can all contribute to reducing the environmental footprint associated with growing crops like alfalfa, regardless of the intended end use.

While the concept of human composting may align with the goal of sustainability, it is essential to critically evaluate the entire process START TO FINISH to determine its true environmental impact. Without careful consideration of ethical, energy, and emissions factors, human composting IS VERY susceptible to greenwashing accusations and activity.

As we continue to navigate an era marked by increasing environmental consciousness, let us remain vigilant against greenwashing tactics. A critical and informed consumer base is instrumental in holding companies accountable for their claims and fostering a culture of genuine environmental responsibility. By demanding authenticity and scrutinizing the practices of those who claim to be green, we contribute to a more sustainable future—one that goes beyond mere marketing ploys and resonates with tangible, positive change for our planet.

ASK QUESTIONS.